Bug Reviews

A desperate woman working as a waitress in a lesbian bar, Agnes White (Ashley Judd) is on edge after her abusive ex-husband Jerry (Harry Connick Jr.) is released from prison. Indulging in booze and drugs, Agnes is introduced to the shy and quirky Peter Evans (Michael Shannon), and the pair immediately hit it off. Agnes lets him stay the night in her seedy motel room, which leads to the two striking up a sexual relationship. While in bed together one night, Peter discovers microscopic bugs that are biting him. He becomes convinced that a bug infestation has broken out and believes that the invisible insects, planted by the government when he was involved in scientific experiments, are coming from his bloodstream.

Although a few short story beats occur in other locations, Bug mostly retains the play's single setting of Agnes' motel room. The idea of a single setting is a troubling proposition for a feature, but Letts and Friedkin keep the pace brisk and the events interesting. Bug cannot be simply labelled as a horror film, as it's more of an exercise in psychological terror and dark comedy, though it has some genuinely horrific moments. It's perhaps best described as a character study of the relationship between a lonely, abused woman and a delusional paranoid with schizophrenic tendencies. We get to observe the two as they gradually grow insane, with Agnes making excuses for being with Peter no matter how delusional he grows, and with Peter developing into a danger for himself and others.

Bug runs the risk of feeling like a filmed stage play, but Friedkin and cinematographer Michael Grady embrace the medium's possibilities. A lot of close-ups are used during the more intense character-based moments, allowing us to absorb the nuances of all of the performances and get more invested in the action. What's extraordinary about the film is how it gradually and methodically builds its characters before all hell breaks loose. In fact, Bug starts as an offbeat story about two strangers who develop somewhat of a romance, while a side conflict presents itself in the form of Agnes' ex-husband. It then essentially transforms into another film entirely. However, the sudden descent into madness doesn't feel choppy or awkward thanks to Friedkin's strong filmmaking sleight of hand; if anything, it makes the picture more shocking. The final scene is particularly gripping as tension levels continue to rise to almost unbearable levels. It's hard to so much as take a breath until the end credits begin to roll.

With the entire film unfolding in a small space and with Friedkin's direction being predominantly unfussy, the real power of the picture emanates from the performances, all of which are excellent. Judd sheds every trace of movie star glamour in playing Agnes; it's a bare-all role in terms of both the nudity and the character's raw emotional state. It's not an attractive performance, but it is compelling and powerful. But it's Shannon who walks away with the entire picture. Shannon had already played Peter in the original play and was only a small-time cinema actor at the time. With Shannon's subsequent rise to fame, it's fascinating to go back and see the actor here in perhaps his greatest performance to date. Slightly odd-looking and creepy yet strangely endearing, Shannon is top-notch here, presenting an astonishing portrait of a radical mental meltdown. It's hard to overstate just how great Judd and Shannon are, and it's difficult to believe they were both overlooked at the Academy Awards.

Bug is not strictly about bugs, but Letts and Friedkin milk the title for everything it's worth. In the beginning, Agnes is constantly bugged by telephone calls, and the story is about Agnes and Peter trying to get rid of the bugs that are apparently infesting their residence and body. Peter even grows to believe that the government implanted electronic bugs into him. This is a very strange and unique film all in all, and it's hard to recommend outright. Yes, it's superb, and it deserves to be seen, but those unprepared to experience what Friedkin offers may ultimately walk away disappointed. Anyone prepared to approach Bug with an open mind should give it a whirl, especially if they like original, experimental movies.

8.5/10

Honestly, even though I always had a weak spot for William Friedkin’s work, it had been a while since I saw one of his movies so I was really eager to check this flick which had been barely seen when it was released. Eventually, it was a flawed but still quite fascinating merciless descent into madness. Beforehand, I had no idea what the movie was about so for the first 30 minutes, even though it was rather unsettling, I was really wondering where it was getting at and I wasn’t really convinced by what was displayed. Indeeed, why did R.C. bring this guy to Agnes’s house? Ok, maybe she thought she was lonely and that she needed some company but why did she choose this guy who seemed to be rather odd and not really the best one-night-stand material? Same thing concerning Agnes. Even though Peter looked and sounded rather creepy, she still let him stay in her house for way too long and it became rather unbelievable at some point. Still, if you put this aside, the rest of the movie was quite impressive. Indeed, basically, nothing actually really happened but this man and this woman were convinced that something was going on and Michael Shannon (whose reputation is growing exponentially every year) and Ashley Judd (whose career seems unfortunately to shrink slowly like most of the actress above 40 years old) were just phenomenal. Indeed, they both gave some fearless and pitch-perfect performances and some of the best depiction of madness I have ever witnessed. To conclude, even though the whole thing didn’t really convince me, the acting was just really strong and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.