Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

Alice Through the Looking Glass

Posted : 6 years, 7 months ago on 23 September 2017 10:37

For all of its narrative faults and condescension towards modern sensibilities, Tim Burtonā€™s Alice in Wonderland still possessed enough of his unique visual eye and thematic obsessions to prove interesting in spots. Alice Through the Looking Glass suffers from the loss of him, but also from fully removing any semblance of narrative tether to the source material. What we have here is an entirely original (I use that term loosely) story that just so happens to involve the immortal characters from Lewis Carrollā€™s works.

Ā 

This is simply a garnish, gaudy, eye-searing mess. A cacophony of action buffeting against the screen for nearly two hours that signifies nothing it makes you wonder why it even exists at all. Of course, Burtonā€™s film ranking in over a billion guaranteed the presence of a sequel sooner or later, and itā€™s downright shocking that it took six years for it to happen, but that doesnā€™t mean it needed to. I canā€™t imagine anyone playing devilā€™s advocate for this thing.

Ā 

The film opens with Alice captaining a cargo ship and youā€™d be forgiven for mistaking it as the opening salvo for the latest entry in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. Does this close a loop on Disneyā€™s ā€œbrand deposits,ā€ or is this the cinematic equivalency of watching a studio act as its own Human Centipede? The answer quickly leans towards the second option as the story interminably chugs along.

Ā 

One of the worst offenses in Burtonā€™s film was Johnny Deppā€™s gonzo Ronald McDonald variation of the Mad Hatter, and Alice Through the Looking Glass never blushes away from orientating the narrative around him. It means more of Deppā€™s exhaustive mugging for the camera, and more of watching a once great actor increasingly cease to give a shit about his craft or quality of work.

Ā 

We meet the Mad Hatterā€™s extended family here, and for some reason, they all appear with normal pallor while Hatter looks like a Goth kid got a neon makeover. This detail alone doesnā€™t make any sense, and neither does the rest of the time travelling narrative or the mystery of why the Hatter is the most important person in Wonderland. Other than the fact that heā€™s played by the biggest star in the cast, thereā€™s never a good reason given behind centralizing the narrative around him and routinely hinting at a creepy, limp romance between him and Alice.

Ā 

Heā€™s not the only character we get the back story on, as the Red and White Queens long-time rivalry is revealed to go back to a dumb childhood fight. We donā€™t need tragic histories for these characters to invest in them. Theyā€™re creatures of pure imagination and fantasy, and they should remain that way. Trying to humanize them makes them woefully uninteresting, even if Helena Bonham Carterā€™s over-sized toddler reading of the Red Queen is still a riot of entitled rage. Alice Through the Looking Glass continually makes these lazy contortions towards human emotion, but theyā€™re always lost amid the garnish CGI displays and flaccid character motivations.

Ā 

Nothing works here. The greatest irony is that the mistakes of the first film are not only repeated, but blown-up into gigantic proportions all the while weā€™re hammered with the theme of the past being impossible to change but necessary to learn from. I see that Disney learned the wrong lessons and merely chased the dollars. They threw more money than I could dream of into this thing but forgot the simple, important things like story, characters, motivations, and coherence.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 7 years, 6 months ago on 7 October 2016 09:21

To be honest, I wasn't Ā expecting much from this flick, especially after it turned out to be a flop at the box-office. I mean, it is all very nice that Disney keeps milking their catalog with these live-adaptations but nobody was really asking for a sequel for this movie, especially 6 long years later. Anyway, even though it turned out to be watchable, it was pretty weak though. Indeed, first of all, it started with a really over-the-top action scene with Alice as a ship captain. I mean, seriously?!? It was just so misguided. Sure, Alice is supposed to be a really special girl but they really pushed her emancipation just way too far. Then, from this introduction, Ā they had to get her back to Wonderland somehow so, completely at random, she went there with some mirror and this transition was just seriously awkward. In Wonderland, they decided to get her involved in some kind of 'Back to the Future' tale which was barely entertaining with a lot of bad jokes about time. In fact, when it was all over, you wonder actually why she had to go through time after all. At least, the whole thing looked really good and there was a nice cast involved so I guess it still worth a look but only if you really loved the first installment.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Alice Through the Looking Glass review

Posted : 7 years, 11 months ago on 28 May 2016 09:40

I was really skeptical about watching this. I despised the first one. I usually like Tim Burton films, but whenever he takes on kids stories like Alice in Wonderland or Willy Wonka they tend to be off-putting for me. I had no idea he only produced this one until I was about to watch it. I figured I would give it a shot since it was playing at my theater. I mean a free movie is a free movie you know. This is directed by James Bobin who did the most recent Muppet movies. It's written by Linda Woolverton who is responsible for some of Disney's greatest like The Lion King, Mulan, and Beauty and the Beast. The beginning was really creative and awesome. A lot of this comes off a bit cheesy with some kindergarten style jokes. It also has some dark humor spread out. I still don't like Johnny Depp's Mad Hatter. I don't have a problem with anyone else here though. I wish Alan Rickman had more than a couple brief lines in the beginning. The new characters are fun and interesting. Time is probably one of the best things about this. I thought the twist about Iracebeth was extremely lackluster and pathetic. I loved what happened when all of time breaks down. I surprisingly thought this was better than the first one. I wouldn't say it was particularly good though. I was just more entertained. It's also really pleasant to look at. If you liked the first one I'm sure you will enjoy this one as well.


0 comments, Reply to this entry