I think we should rate music by songs, not albums. I mean, many download Mp3 anyway. What if someone wanted to rate one off the radio?
Added on May 8 5:25
Both? I don't buy albums because when I download I know what songs I like and what songs I don't. If you are the slightly more meticulous type maybe there are options tosuit both of us.
i am agreed by your views because both have values need to maintained the quality to give the best out put.
Add singles to the database yourself and rate them that way. I think music collectors would much prefer whole albums to remain.
i think it's a good idea, can manage single songs, and maybe is simple too cause on amazon there are already listed songs of the albums(it's just to expand the code that takes information and links from the site)
about downloading, can be useful but this site it's good without too
Never Songs Only.
We should do both songs and albums.
Artists releases Album Not Tracks....except in the 40s-50s when 7inch and 78rpm ruled
I think we should also be able to manage non-single tracks too. Some of my favorite singer's best songs wasn't released as a single, not saying their single suck but their non-singles songs are sometimes better than the ones that got released.
Totally disagree with this. That's what Greatest Hits compilations are for. There is still at least people like me that will review an entire album since it's an entire piece of music. If you want to review songs, then go through singles.
We should rate the music the way it was released; if it was not released as a single, it therefore comes in no other packaging than on an album. Itunes can suck my dick.