Reviews of Spider-Man 2

A Rare Sequel That's Better Than The First

Posted : 8 months ago on 16 April 2009 01:14 (A review of Spider-Man 2)

In this one, Peter Parker roughs thru his dilemas with the same down-to-earth fustrations as in the comicbooks, his relationship with Mary Jane convincingly reaches it's next level, & Doc Ock is portrayed much better as a villian than he ever was on the printed age.
As a hardcore nerd of this genre, I was pretty satisfied at Marvel's initial effort at trying to do what Burton did with the Batman; introduce the webhead as a serious legitimate property for film.
The most I could've hoped for this sequel was that it be at least half as good as it's predessor.
Instead, Spidey-2 turned out to become one of my favorite movie adaptations of a comicbook superhero ever.
Which I guess I should've anticipated since before I entered the theatre, my spider-senses didn't go off, all atingling an' sh*t.




0 comments, Reply to this entry

Go get them Tiger !

Posted : 10 months, 3 weeks ago on 27 January 2009 12:19 (A review of Spider-Man 2)

2 of Spider-Man was better tha first, M.Ji founded out Peter's Spidey we herard a lot of remarkable quotes. Kirsten Dunst, still gorgeous.

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Upside down love.

Posted : 1 year, 2 months ago on 12 October 2008 08:31 (A review of Spider-Man 2)

Mary Jane may be slutty but she's the only girl Peter has ever loved. And yes, that upside-down kiss is something.

Peter Parker ♥ Mary Jane Watson


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Spider-Man 2 review

Posted : 2 years, 6 months ago on 11 June 2007 09:18 (A review of Spider-Man 2)

Ugh. Out of all of Spider-Man's villains, why, WHY pick Dr. Octopus? The most ridiculous one, and you picked him, Sam. Thanks. You ruined what could have been a good sequel, had you just picked Shocker, or Chameleon. Hell, even Venom was a better villain. And Venom was horrible on-screen. This movie was ridiculous. I'd still watch it, maybe, if I'm bored enough and want to watch the movies in sequence.

0 comments, Reply to this entry