"When you're young everything feels like the end of the world. But it's not... It's just the beginning."
Imagine a feeble, generic screenplay (mixing equal parts of Back to the Future, It's a Wonderful Life as well as Big) and mediocre acting. These are the basic constituents that make up 17 Again; a by-the-numbers teen comedy ostensibly green-list for the sole purpose of spotlighti... read more
This was a cute movie. Not a total waste of my time. I actually enjoyed it, but I don't think I would have wanted to spend $10 to see it in the movie theater.
Of course this movie is predictable, but if you are in the mood for a light-hearted, family comedy, I would recommend this.
Description:What would you do if you got a second shot at life? Class of 1989, Mike O’Donnell is a star on his high school basketball court with a college scout in the stands and a bright future in his grasp. But instead, he decides to throw it all away to share his life with his girlfriend Scarlett and the baby he just learned they are expectiWhat would you do if you got a second shot at life? Class of 1989, Mike O’Donnell is a star on his high school basketball court with a college scout in the stands and a bright future in his grasp. But instead, he decides to throw it all away to share his life with his girlfriend Scarlett and the baby he just learned they are expecting. Almost 20 years later, Mike’s glory days are decidedly behind him. His marriage to Scarlett has fallen apart, he has been passed over for a promotion at work, his teenage kids think he is a loser, and he has been reduced to crashing with his high school nerd-turned-techno-billionaire best friend Ned. But Mike is given another chance when he is miraculously transformed back to the age of 17. Unfortunately, Mike may look 17 again, but his thirtysomething outlook is totally uncool in the class of 2009. And in trying to recapture his best years, Mike could lose the best things that ever happened to him.... (more)(less)
“I think this film would have benefitted greatly from a different lead. Zac Efron cannot act very well :S The storyline itself was a little weird, especially at the end, when things didn't quite wrap up completely. The whole custodian-gift-giver thing was kind of random and while it is 'magic' it didn't seem very believable for the context. Sterling Knight and Michelle Trachtenberg were alright as supporting characters, though the character Maggie's behaviour was erratic and didn't make sense - for example, Stan broke up with her because she wouldn't 'put out' but yet she tries to do it with Mike/Mark? I understand that she was vulnerable and everything but again, it doesn't seem very believable. Overall, I give this one a 5, because while there are some saving graces in there (i.e. Thomas ” read more
"
First Viewing
It was okay. Efron does a decent job breaking away from his Disney roots, but overall there aren't enough laughs from a plot that should result in more."
"December 12
When this movie came out I avoided it because of my hatred for Zac Efron, but since it got positive feedback I decided to watch it. I should've kept avoiding it because this was terrible. Zac Efron was so bad that it made me miss Matthew Perry's character and I'm not even a fan of him. This is another body swap comedy. It wouldn't bother me so much if this movie was funny, but it isn't. This movie was around an hour and forty minutes, but it felt much longer than that. Please avoid "