Top 10 worst movies 2010

335   4.7   4.8 

Note : Why on Earth every single major action movie star always get involved in some worthless comedies? Anyway, the whole thing was just an inane and stupid familly feature and an incredible waste of talent.

johanlefourbe's rating:

633   4.7   3.9 

Note : Honestly, the first installment was not bad at all but this sequel was downright awfull. It was boring, misguided and lasted forever (about 150 mins!). The humor was horrendous and to send them in such a luxurious decadent hotel was totally inappropriate in this time of economic depression when many struggle to make ends meet.

johanlefourbe's rating:

634   5.3   5.2 

Note : Gosh... That was painful... Right from the start, this movie seemed to be a disaster. First, you have a really annoying scene with Katherine Heigl and her parents in a plane. Then, you have a really pathetic scene when Ashton Kutcher is supposed to convince us that he is a spy. Finally, they get together in a lift and Kutcher pretends he speaks fluently French.... I mean, I'm French and I could barely understand what he said! I mean, he is a freaking actor! Can't he learn how to speak out properly 2 lines of French?!? And those were the very first 3 scenes of the movie...

johanlefourbe's rating:

161   4.8   4.9 

Note : Even though I'm a sucker for those post-apocalyptic features, this one was rather weak. First of all, the special effects for the shadows were pretty cheesy and it would have worked better if they didn't show anything, in my opinion. Finally, the story was just really weak and didn't add anything to the overused formula.

johanlefourbe's rating:

61   5.2   5.6 

Note : I must admit, it was a little bit better than Tim Allen's usual fare. First of all, there was a pretty cool cast and I especially enjoyed Sigourney Weaver which displayed some pretty good comedic skills here. Still, who I am kidding ? Like I said before, even though it was a little bit better than the usual Tim Allen’s flicks, it was still damned average. I mean, the whole thing was just really unfocused with way too many undeveloped and uninteresting sub-plots.

johanlefourbe's rating:

185   5.1   4.6 

Note : What happened to Wes Craven?!? This flick is such an obvious attempt to recreate the same success he had with 'Scream', it was just really pathetic to behold... The concept had some potential but the execution was just pityful. I'm really being generous with my rating here and this movie might be even worse than 'Cursed' which was already a total mess.

johanlefourbe's rating:

596   6.5   6.3 

Note : I find it really hilarious when other viewers argue that this movie is dealing with true love. Give me a break... It deals with some of the oldest Hollywood romantic clichés, not true love. I guess I'm just too cynical for this kind of movies, anyway, I didn't like it much.

johanlefourbe's rating:

532   6   5.9 

Note : I thought this movie was just so embarassing... I mean, I have a weak spot for romantic comedies but this was just plain average. In the same year, they managed to release 2 rom-coms dealing with artificial insemination and both were just terribly uninspired. At least, with 'The Back-Up', I enjoyed the chemistry between the two leads and, right from the start, they knew what was going on. Here, you just had this terribly annoying misunderstanding/lie trick stretched out forever...

johanlefourbe's rating:

561   5.6   5.8 

Note : Since it is a very stupid concept, I didn't expect much from this flick but how can you do so wrong with such a cast (Steve Carell, Paul Rudd, Zach Galifianakis)?!? The whole thing is terribly unfunny and just really boring.

johanlefourbe's rating:

494   5.8   5.2 

Note : Basically, it is one of those romcom with a concept based on some rather random superstitious belief. The main issue, in my opinion, is that instead of getting to know the characters and their new blossoming romance, you spend a lot of time with some stupid jokes around the superstitious stuff.

johanlefourbe's rating: