Join Listal here 
Existing members 
Login here 
Join Listal to create lists, share images, get recommendations and much more
Added by ToonHead2102

on 20 May 2011 06:35

7481 Views 11 Comments

3003 Movies Into the Golden Age!!! far?

Choose file... or enter url:
Sort by: Showing 1-50 of 3003
Next » 1« Prev

Attention! Read Below:

Am currently in the process of making some modifications to this list. Finally decided to go through with it after debating with myself about something for the past week or so. Since it was so bluntly suggested to me below that - "how can I claim to call these movies the best I've ever seen when I haven't even seen all of them?..." - I decided to look into it and found that the number of movies I've actually seen (based on star rankings I've given out) hasn't actually reached '3003'! Therefore, I don't know how many are gonna like this change, or think it even makes sense - but I've decided to start including even BAD movies that I've seen, on this list - just for the sake of being able to say I've actually watched every movie on here.

Therefore, as you scroll below, this is now a collection of every movie I've ever since (that I can remember?) and as soon as I reach the number 3003 -which I'm rapidly catching up to just so y'all know- I'll start getting discriminatory and eliminate the junk. But at least by then I'll be able to say I haven't personally viewed every entry on this list!

If anyone disagrees or objects (or on the contrary) to this decision, please feel free to comment below. Hope this clears things up about some of the lower ranked movies you might find here on this thing. Movies without star ranking are films I'm planning to watch next, and entries with reviews or pics are the ones I'm certain (for now) on keeping...
People who added this item 145  Average listal rating (97 ratings) 6.6  IMDB Rating 6.9 
3003. Workers Leaving the Factory (1895)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 242  Average listal rating (155 ratings) 7.1  IMDB Rating 7.3 
3002. The Arrival of a Train at Station (1896)
Directed by the Lumière Brothers

AUGUSTE and LOUIS LUMIÈRE were considered the pioneers of motion picture. Without their involvement towards the advancement of moving still photographs cinema would not progress into the 20th, 21st Century and beyond! To this day their name can still be found on production companies and elsewhere as a living testament to all that they helped make possible, despite the fact that it's been rumored they attempted to 'block' the creative efforts of aspiring up and coming film artists such as Georges Méliès, from ever rising to prestige. Working under their father in the study of photography, it was only after he had passed away that the sons got the initiative to start what would be the beginning of early filmmaking by producing a series of short films under a minute which silly as it may seem to today's youth, was actually quite MIND-BLOWING for the time!

All of these short films that they released constituted documentary style mis-en-scene moments, showing arbitrary tasks such as workers leaving a factory for the day. Here, I want to focus on only one of their films in particular. This movie is considered to be the pioneer of suspense films as it has now and again been credited to be history's first horror movie. The plot is simple enough, it's exactly as the title reads. You simply see a train of the Union Pacific Railroad Co. arrive at Cheyenne, Wyoming station. Nothing could be more dull, right?

Well, to get the right picture you have to imagine yourself back in 1896 when this movie was released. People had never seen a moving picture before and certainly not on a 20 plus foot by 50 plus wide projection screen?! It's been noted that upon the film's first showing people ran screaming for their lives from the movie theater cause they assumed this was the image of a real live locomotive train coming at them, they thought it was gonna bust through the screen and squish them. --Without the addition of this short but effective documentary thriller, horror films or slasher movies, or any form of movie suspense whatsoever would not have given birth, and for that this film deserves cinephiles' respect - as literally the very first movie to make an audience SHIT THEIR PANTS!...

ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 89  Average listal rating (58 ratings) 5.9  IMDB Rating 5.9 
3001. The Kiss (1896)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 980  Average listal rating (563 ratings) 8.1  IMDB Rating 8.2 
3000. A Trip to the Moon (1902)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 399  Average listal rating (239 ratings) 7.2  IMDB Rating 7.4 
2999. The Great Train Robbery (1903)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 84  Average listal rating (47 ratings) 8  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2998. An Impossible Voyage (1904)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 119  Average listal rating (47 ratings) 7.5  IMDB Rating 6.9 
2997. L'Inferno (1911)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 75  Average listal rating (47 ratings) 7.5  IMDB Rating 7.9 
2996. The Cameraman's Revenge (1912)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 84  Average listal rating (35 ratings) 6.7  IMDB Rating 6.6 
2995. Cabiria (1914)

People who added this item 4  Average listal rating (1 ratings) 6  IMDB Rating 6.4 
2994. Children of the Age (1915)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 39  Average listal rating (19 ratings) 7.2  IMDB Rating 6.5 
2993. After Death (1915)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 315  Average listal rating (153 ratings) 7.8  IMDB Rating
2992. Intolerance (1916)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 23  Average listal rating (19 ratings) 6.9  IMDB Rating 6.9 
2991. I Don't Want to Be a Man (1918)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 243  Average listal rating (117 ratings) 7.7  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2990. Broken Blossoms (1919)

People who added this item 995  Average listal rating (552 ratings) 8.2  IMDB Rating 8.1 
2989. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 187  Average listal rating (79 ratings) 7.4  IMDB Rating 7.2 
2988. The Golem (1920)

People who added this item 59  Average listal rating (26 ratings) 6.6  IMDB Rating 6.4 
2987. Within Our Gates (1920)

People who added this item 256  Average listal rating (118 ratings) 8.3  IMDB Rating
2986. The Phantom Carriage (1921)

People who added this item 799  Average listal rating (508 ratings) 8.3  IMDB Rating 8.4 
2985. The Kid (1921)
Directed by Charles Chaplin

Marking Chaplin's first major 'critical' and 'commercial' breakthrough, this box-office darling won him prestige for starring, writing and directing it himself, and starting him down a newly reinvigorated path of his still young and promising film career. One of the major archetypal turning points in the evolution of his premiere recurring film character the Little Tramp (who Charlie first appeared as in 1914's "Mabel's Strange Predicament", and inspired Chaplin admits in his autobiography, quite by accident - the character would not appear again until 1915's short "The Tramp") Chaplin here set bold new standards for himself, as well as promising young -former vaudeville- co-star Jackie Coogan, where as for Coogan (who acts here as the film's title character "the kid") this was the start of a fresh and promising solo career as the pioneer of a future deplorable industry 'within' the industry, being Hollywood's 'first' true young major film star (YEARS before Shirley Temple entered onto the scene!) for Chaplin, the film was not only a comedic highlight but showcased also his range at evoking true genuine human warmth on screen, and would forever change the course of his career as hence forth his roles would become more dynamically serious (climaxing perhaps in the introduction to the Tramp's dark side in 1940's "the Great Dictator"?) "The Kid" was a crowd-pleaser and managed to become the second highest grossing film at the box office of 1921 (just behind Rex Ingram's "the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse") yet despite all it's accolades years to come, the film's release and production of, wasn't met without considerable controversy and sacrifice - a project that took Chaplin over a year to complete - and several decades later to be considered for preservation by the Library of Congress's National Film Registry. And to this day maintains a cult status amongst Chaplin's admirers and fans of the Tramp series.

The story opens on the subtitles A picture with a smile-and perhaps, a tear and The woman - whose sin was motherhood, which sets the tone for the proceeding feature. A young lady (played evocatively by Edna Purviance) departs from a charity hospital, with babe in arms. It's learned shortly after that the father (played by Carl Miller) is out of the picture for being out of the question - a rich bureaucrat who turns out to be engaged to another. He puts the young woman out of mind and eventually follows his destined path as an accomplished painter. The mother, heartbroken and destitute, leaves the baby in the back of a limousine, expecting he'll be looked after by the family who owns the house the vehicle parked in front of. Only should a bizarre twist of fate befall the child, a pair of crooks hijack the limo and upon discovering the child, dump the baby off in the gutter of a local slum district. Enter our principal protagonist the Little Tramp (Chaplin) who just happens to be passing by when upon discovering the child assumes he must belong to someone close by. Comically, the Tramp attempt to pawn the child off on near-by stragglers (including a hilarious abusive mother who's carriage the Tramp tries to stuff the child in, with repeated failure) only to later accept responsibility when discovering a note accompanying the baby which reads "Please love and care for this orphan child," left by the mother. --Meanwhile, across town, when the severity of the decision finally hits the mother it proves to be too late, discovering the limousine missing?

Five years pass and the boy and Tramp have become a couple of live-in con artists who continue to invent new and cleverly inventive schemes to get rich quick in their present dog-eat-dog state of existence. The Kid (whose name Chaplin mentions is 'John' apparently?) is now the Tramp's adopted son and sidekick, whose company the Tramp has now become accustomed to. Meanwhile it's soon discovered the mother and father's course of fates are destined to intertwine with one another once again, the father - now a respected painter, and the mother - now a star of great prominence, now with the shoe on the other foot the mother refuses the father's reconciliation and devotes her time mainly to charity work of the underprivileged districts of town - each time, mother and child agonizingly come closer to reuniting when coming into contact without one realizing who the other one really is. Fate, however, plays a divine poignant twist when the boy succumbs to sudden illness and a visit from a middle-aged country doctor results in an impromptu seizure of the child by authorities from the County Orphan Asylum. The cruel irony being that the Tramp, originally not wanting the child, is forced by a cruel oligarchical system to take the infant against his wishes, now that 'same' cruel system attempts to tear the two apart by force, and the Tramp's fatherly devotion has become unconditional!

Although seemingly out of his element, with this D.W. Griffin-style tearjerker, Chaplin's whose name has since come to literally personify comedy, nevertheless pulls off this difficult material with near-effortless ease. Highlights involve the Tramp's trademark brilliantly choreographed duel with a bully made of grit and steel fists; an amusing anecdotal mise-en-scene moment involving Chaplin cutting out diapers for the baby, from bed sheets, only to be abruptly stopped by the child's crying in the homemade hammock next to him when unable to reach the nozzle of the coffee pot (used as a stand-in for the nipple of a bottle), when the Tramp lovingly guides the nozzle back to mouth; but by far though, the film's most memorable and recognizable sequence, highlighting equally Chaplin and Coogan's range as resonate screen presences as well as showcasing their chemistry together, would undoubtedly be Tramp and Kid's emotional reunion at the end of the rooftop sequence which should go down as one of the most pivotal scenes of any film in all of cinema history!!!

A difficult film for Chaplin to film though - fueled mainly by Chaplin's own real-life tragedy at the loss of his, and then wife, Mildred Harris's, first-born child, which resulted in a public and heated bitter divorce between Chaplin and Harris -which almost resulted in the suppression of the film- as well, the film's subject matter, was more or less inspired by Chaplin's own morbid recollection of growing up under cruel social welfare in London. -As part of the tragedy of the child actors industry in Hollywood Chaplin has admitted in his autobiography that star Coogan during production of the film, was coaxed into providing real genuine tears in the emotional separation sequence by being threatened off camera that if he didn't provide the filmmakers with what they needed for the scene he would be sent to a real-life child workhouse immediately after!- The failure of the film's original copywrites owner resulted in the film's possession to eventually fall into public domain (as many of the early silent classics succumbed to) and as a result the film became mutilated and later lost for nearly five decades before Chaplin took it upon himself to reconstitute the movie. The film has become a memorable classic ever since, and also, in my opinion, highlights the film's director and star, for not just the visionary genius that he was, but also the aspiring philosopher that he was, critics and fans alike fail to recognize. Toward the film's climax there is an impromptu dream sequence that is surreal enough to have inspired the later works of Luis Buñuel, which is so perplexing it feels as if having wandered in from another movie? The scene in question involves a curious mixture of the Tramp's real-world slum quarters and inhabitants, acting out some sort of mock-representation of Lucifer's Expulsion from Heaven crossed with the Descent of Man, which just goes to show you - well ahead of any visionary of his time, before "What the Bleep? Down the Rabbit Hole!" or any of the so-called philosophers of the Freudian-obsessed Marxist '60s and '70s, with inflated-artists ranging from Jean-Luc Godard to Ingmar Bergman to Woody Allen, Chaplin was less a pessimist and seemed more concerned with questioning how such a cruel, and uncaring cyclical system of man's worst emotions playing off each other, ever come in to being in the first place? Powerful thought spent for just little over 60 min. runtime. A must see for every cinephile's own personal bucket list!...

ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 292  Average listal rating (147 ratings) 7.5  IMDB Rating 7.8 
2984. Nanook of the North (1922)
Directed by Robert J. Flaherty

Considered by some to be the ABSOLUTE birth of feature length documentary filmmaking, although the overall result is anything of the sort when you consider the film's history. Quite a significant bit before my time, this film even outdates the birth of my parents! It's hard for me to get in to something not nearly an entire century later in the face of more authentic filmmaking in the representation of the Inuit people such as "Atanarjuat: the Fast Runner" or "Before Tomorrow". But far be it from me to deny this groundbreaking movie and all that it paved the way for future generations of ethnographic visionaries. For the time being - the technology in film at the time era being what it was - this cinematic spectacle earns a spot on this list for the sake of quality and 'intention'. I mean my God, imagine the times and what the makers had to go through to capture some of the images that they did? -Most of you probably don't live where I live, especially you Southerners, you're probably not in a position to grasp what harsh Upper Canadian winters are like? Hell, having been filmed in what is now the province of Nunavut, even the 'summers' here are jacked with frostbitten dreary. Beautiful as it may be to look at - and believe me this early '20s marvel expertly captures the stunning beauty of the glacial unrelenting terrain - the truth is places such as this can be an all around deathtrap if you don't know what you're doing.

Filmed in the harsh unforgiving terrain of Northern Ungava (Quebec territory) in what the film states early on in the movie is a considerable strip of land the size of England, yet populates less than 300 souls. What seems to the modern viewer like a barren wasteland to the Inuk (or Eskimo as Flaherty keeps calling them in the film) it is simply home, and it makes privileged suburban dwellers collectively scratch their heads as to WHY on Earth any common-sensed human being would want to spend repeated lifetimes of living here - yet the Eskimo people have inhabited this area for countless generations from one to the next since before there were even white European settlers here to pollute it. It is their way of living that the film attempts to document and it is an existence that seems almost to exist outside of time, having no immediate discernible markers of any sort of time period, you could be watching something out of times of ancient past or a movie that was shot yesterday? --Although tagged with being the first outright documentary feature length, numerous critics and experts (including the director himself and members of his family) have over the decades since it's release gone on to both defend and admonish this film for it's inauthenticity, since it's been heavily documented many of the established scenes (if not the whole film entirely) was staged on part by Flaherty and thus is not a genuine unmolested representation of natural Eskimo life. This much is true, and should not be overlooked since Flaherty himself went so far as to spell it out to the audience in the original title card of the original showing of the movie Nanook of the North - A story of life and love in the actual arctic.

The infamous story surrounding this film's background concerns it's tainted humble beginnings as an experimental project by a man who had no prior film experience and never intended outright to become a legitimate movie director. Robert J. Flaherty was originally hired by railway contractor Sir William MacKenzie to assist in the prospecting of and a series of expeditions in the area east of the Hudson Bay, such as Baffin Island which in itself is yet another hopeless wasteland to the inexperienced, what some have credited saying "If you ever get a chance to visit Canada's largest island, you'll probably find more glaciers than people." Along the way becoming enamored in the culture and philosophy of the Inuk people who Flaherty got to know real well, the proposition was eventually brought about him to film his experiences despite having no real idea what the hell he was doing. One has to understand this being the turn of the century filmmaking was quite frankly a brand new concept and no one had ever even attempted to capture modern day life onto film post 1902? The story goes that the end results were something purely magical. Flaherty managing to capture countless breathtaking images and events, the likes of which presumably could never be repeated again without the presence of spontaneity. Shooting lasted from 1914 to 1915 and Flaherty had apparently gotten all the footage he needed when something altogether unexpected happen, disaster is the worst and most aggravating way - when tossing a lit cigarette butt into a container of the flammable nitrate film, accidentally - the film caught on fire and about 30,000 feet were lost forever ... ... ... OOPS?!? What a moron?

The only thing left that could be done was for Flaherty to go back and try again but rather than naively attempt to re-create the once in a lifetime footage that he previously captured, Flaherty instead got the bright idea to re-construct the concept of the film entirely. Using unrelated more photogenic Inuk models to pose as one particular family over the course of a year or so living out precariously on the edge of the Arctic circle - while it's been clearly documented ever since that not only is Nanook the title character of our story, not his true name (his real one being Allakariallak) but the two women in the film played to represent his wives, aren't even married to him or have any relation whatsoever. The are infact common-law relatives to the director, credited Nyla and Cunayou in the film. And also what about the kids? -Furthermore, Flaherty went to considerable lengths to attempt to capture pre-European settlement Inuit life by encouraging Allakariallak to use the methods of his ancestors rather than modern technology. (There's even a particular scene depicted in the film where Nanook is seen wrestling with a seal under a layer of ice attempting to capture and harvest it for meat, when in fact the truth is the seal used during the shoot was infact already dead and the struggle seen by the protagonist was actually the result of blatant overacting. But looking so vivid and convincing to local residents that at one point during several staged encounters with wild animals Flaherty was urged to stop shooting the thing with film and start shooting it with a rifle instead. Flaherty pretended not to hear them of course for the sake of making visual art.)

Filmmaking at the time had no original market for documentaries, that style having been outdated and abandoned since the Lumière Brothers, to give way for traditional fiction storytelling like Georges Melies and D.W. Griffith. So it's natural (and understandable) to assume Flaherty would be predispositioned to accustoming the linear fictional storytelling format of mainstream cinema and thus incorporated that into the filming of this project. The overall results aren't entirely without merit, the locations for one are real and they are really shooting in harsh subglacial temperate and having to catch difficult mind-bending shots from aboard kayaks, inside (custom designed it seems) igloos, and with minimal to no artificial lighting, this movie still is worth commemoration for setting a precedent and capturing breathtaking, evocative cinematography that at once set the standards for filmmaking to come. All the live animals you seen in the film are REAL and not bound to scripting even if some of the characters in the film are.

The film's also worth it's controversy and patronization. As one commenter pointed out when comparing it to modern day Inuit cinema Flaherty despite seeming to show genuine infatuation with the Inuk culture, seems to study them more like an entomologist would study a species of insect, in other words an outside looking in? That's a little bit creepy, and disrespectful - but it having nearly been a literal hundred years ago one can hardly blame his misplaced enthusiasm. All in all, I'd say it's like one of those films that you truly have to see, it will capture the imagination and illuminate the soul such as the poignant beauty of the igloo scene where Flaherty is demonstrating a three stage process - first there is shelter (the dome) then warmth, and finally light (the window) and truly a heart-mending aesthetic sequence. But in conjunction with the solicitous nature of near slapstick 'scripted' comical sequences such as the clown car kayak or the naivete of Nanook biting the gramophone record - this viewing experience should be taken with a grain of salt! It can't be entirely bad when it's been credited the Inuk people seemed to approve of the content upon initial first screenings - but I still have my doubts?...

ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 1451  Average listal rating (800 ratings) 8  IMDB Rating
2983. Nosferatu (1922)
[Review in Working Progress...]
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 370  Average listal rating (161 ratings) 8  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2982. Häxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 117  Average listal rating (53 ratings) 7.5  IMDB Rating 7.4 
2981. Foolish Wives (1922)

People who added this item 187  Average listal rating (107 ratings) 7.8  IMDB Rating
2980. Our Hospitality (1923)

People who added this item 75  Average listal rating (29 ratings) 7.7  IMDB Rating 7.6 
2979. The Wheel (1923)

People who added this item 282  Average listal rating (164 ratings) 8  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2978. Safety Last! (1923)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 87  Average listal rating (37 ratings) 7.2  IMDB Rating 6.8 
2977. The Smiling Madame Beudet (1923)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 180  Average listal rating (82 ratings) 7.8  IMDB Rating 7.9 
2976. The Thief of Bagdad (1924)

People who added this item 259  Average listal rating (124 ratings) 8.1  IMDB Rating 8.1 
2975. The Last Laugh (1924)

People who added this item 279  Average listal rating (104 ratings) 8.1  IMDB Rating 7.9 
2974. Greed (1924)

People who added this item 442  Average listal rating (262 ratings) 8.5  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2973. Sherlock, Jr. (1924)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 41  Average listal rating (20 ratings) 7.2  IMDB Rating 7.3 
2972. Michael (1924)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 802  Average listal rating (511 ratings) 8.2  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2971. The Gold Rush (1925)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 391  Average listal rating (205 ratings) 7.6  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2970. The Phantom of the Opera (1925)

People who added this item 126  Average listal rating (45 ratings) 7.9  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2969. The Big Parade (1925)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 744  Average listal rating (450 ratings) 8.1  IMDB Rating
2968. Battleship Potemkin (1925)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 70  Average listal rating (39 ratings) 6.9  IMDB Rating 7.1 
2967. The Lost World (1925)
Directed by Harry O. Hoyt

Before I start I should confess that the version I watched (just recently) is the worst version of the movie available, only 64 minutes, when there are longer versions in existence - not sure if they're in circulation, but nevertheless - I think I've seen this movie once before a long time ago so I think I have what I need to proceed. So for fans of the original who think I oughta watch the long cut before commenting, send me a link or don't read the following, cause this is the version I'm choosing to run with for this review. What can I say, my time is precious (and limited.)

Despite that being said though, though this film is nearly knocked back to the Stone Age in the face of the "Jurassic Park" generation, this film still deserves it's props for being one of the groundbreaking, pioneer dinosaur movies that 'set the stage' for everything to come. I have yet to actually read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's original novel by which the movie is adapted from, the franchise of course has since gone on to be adapted for movies and television, and this includes one of my all time favorite sci-fi adventures series growing up staring Jennifer O'Dell as the jungle swinging Veronica Layton (da-aam!), but I'm willing to bet that with each new update the material has since gotten further and further away from Doyle's original creation, and gets more 'nutty' with each installment. That makes this version more or less the most serious and authentic treatment of the work that's been released thus. -Although I stress that this movie probably shouldn't be taken TOO seriously, at least not in the sense of "Masterpiece Theater" or anything, as the characters and story play background noise to the MAIN attraction that had the movie-goers of yesteryear shittin' themselves senseless at Willis O'Brien's then state of the art special effects. The very same effects he would later go on to blow everyone's brains out with the release of "King Kong" nine years later.

The story revolves around the great veteran actor Wallace Beery playing the infamous Professor Challenger, considered a loon by his peers for his endless rants concerning his wise-tales of dinosaurs in the flesh that exist in the remote part of the Earth, undisturbed since their existence in isolation as part of "the Lost World" located somewhere in the Amazon. Challenger is met with opposition attempting to acquire a team that will help him to locate the lost Maple White. An explorer who leaves behind a daughter and has gone missing under mysterious circumstances. At first, Edward Malone, young impressionable aspiring reporter is brought in with the intention he plans to expose Challenger for the crackpot he is or do a slur campaign, but when he hears first hand Challenger's true to heart accounts, he becomes excited - and wants in! Malone doesn't begin with the best of first impressions, knowing he is a reporter Challenger at first refuses Malone's company and Malone is forced to 'prove himself' to the Professor. Only after learning that he is indeed a good friend of another esteemed colleague joining the expedition, Sir John Roxton, does Challenger agree to Malone accompaniment. The fourth in the cast of main characters is the missing explorer's daughter Paula who joins the crew and acts as the film's primary love interest - you knew they had to have one! -All the members involved have no clue what to expect and thus are naturally ready for disappointment, I'm sure even Challenger himself dreads this possibility in private. But the adventure truly takes off and the magic and mystery of the story unravels after traveling to Venezuela, where the characters are seen climbing a massive cliff only to knock down a tree to cross a treacherous gorge which will officially take them into ...the Lost World. Knowing they will soon be reunited with their missing colleague and Challenger will be able to bring back evidential proof of the Lost World's existence, forever changing the world as we know it, only for all their hopes to painfully be dashed when encountering an enraged brontosaurus who smashes the tree allowing it to fall and thus seal off the team's exit. They are now trapped in the Lost World forever, what will become of them?

The rest of the movie really writes itself and can be summarized by watching the "Jurassic Park sequel" which loosely chronicles the events of this story in a modern depiction. By far the 'highlight' of the film and probably the iconic image that will most stick out in youngsters' minds about this movie is the film's climax involving a rampaging brontosaurus in downtown New York, just smashing the shit out of everything! You can earnestly feel the terror of 'two' perspectives, first: the panic of the New York pedestrians suddenly come face to face with a reality out of their worst nightmares come alive and I'm sure must seem still so unreal to witness such a thing before your very eyes with no time to truly digest such a change in reality. The second: being the brontosaurus himself, obviously placed inside an era outside his natural frame of reference, he must be freaking out to see the startling complex society and architecture that these little ants (human beings) have seemed to built for themselves. And there are a LOT of them now, as supposed to just Challenger and his crew back in the Lost World. I'd be flippin' my lid too if I were in it's shoes.

One thing that's worth mentioning, in comparison to the movie's more dominant successor "King Kong", in this film I was relieved to see if nothing else, was more scientifically authentic in which I'm speaking purely of the fact that they depict the brontosaurus as a herbivore, where as I thought it was completely INSANE that everything on Skull Island was primarily carnivorous, that island's Eco-system is seriously f***ed! -But truly the effects are worth mentioning here as they were (and probably still are) considered quite groundbreaking for it's time. It seemed to even impress Harry Houdini who has been reported at being at a loss to decipher the trick in the fight scenes between the brontosaurus and allosaurus when Sir Doyle first screened the movie for him. I remember when "Jurassic Park" was first being released and dino-hysteria was all the buzz amongst kids my age, I didn't get to see the movie until after everyone else had, but I remember they had all these 'exhibits' set up on the outskirts of towns that our mom would take me and my bro to go see. And it seemed like now that JP had gotten kids interested in dinosaurs again (as me and my bro were dino-freaks ourselves I must admit) vendors took this liberty to showcase marathon matinees of every movie about dinosaurs (except "King Kong") in existence to get the kids 'caught up' I suppose. I distinctly remember this movie being featured among them. It's not a perfect film, and I can certainly understand a younger generation growing restless and frustrated upon initial viewing. But for those of you, nostalgia movie buffs, will certainly be able to appreciate the technological breakthrough that was achieved through this film's release!...

ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 184  Average listal rating (103 ratings) 7.9  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2966. Strike (1925)

People who added this item 159  Average listal rating (97 ratings) 7.8  IMDB Rating
2965. Seven Chances (1925)

People who added this item 333  Average listal rating (140 ratings) 8.2  IMDB Rating
2964. Faust (1926)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 607  Average listal rating (372 ratings) 8.3  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2963. The General (1926)
Directed by Clyde Bruckman and Buster Keaton

Being none too familiar with Buster Keaton movies I am inclined to agree with most cinephiles that this film perhaps is undoubtedly Keaton's seminal 'masterpiece', considered a comical farce I find myself a bit perplexed as I found the humor to be humbly contained - what really hooked me more about this movie was the action how excited I was for a movie made so long ago, not a single moment of this film is wasted and is used to further the central plot along at a 'nail-biting' pace - to an otherwise awe-inspiring, precedent setting conclusion! My readers will have to forgive me if I am forced to refer to other more credited sources on this one (such as Roger Ebert) not that I'm trying to pass off their critique as my own but I happen to agree with what others have to say and am not sure what else I could possibly add to an already much credited silent comedy classic. -Although I haven't been a fan before I find myself, quickly becoming a Keaton fan all the same for very specific reasons which are never better illustrated than in this picture, one of Keaton's most beloved and critically acclaimed master-works - not to mention most likely most 'elaborate', considering the thrilling over the top climax consists of one of the most EXPENSIVE film stunts in cinematic history considering the times!

Keaton plays the main protagonist, Johnny Gray, with quiet humility as an underdog, and a bit of a pity case yet managing to maintain his romantic appeal as the unrequited female heroine's affection. Johnny has two loves in his life - the love for the trains he works on as an engineer, and that for the 'apple of his eye' the southern belle Annabelle Lee (played just brilliantly by Marion Mack, who really deserves more credit being able to match wits with Keaton's flawless comedic timing). What's intriguing about Keaton in his deadpan delivery as compared to the manic speed and overacting of various rivals of his time like Chaplin and the Marx Bros. is as Roger Ebert has pointed out in his review of the film "Other silent actors might mug to get a point across, but Keaton remained observant and collected...He seems like a modern visitor to the world of the silent clowns." Keaton is idealistic as a empathic male protagonist because he seems no different from you or I, any average modern man in today's emotional heightened society cause easily relate to him cause rather than attempt to stick out, Keaton seems more interested in blending in. With my own personal love life being what it is I gotta tell y'all I've lately come to appreciate these loveable 'down on their luck' losers and none more archetype than Johnny here, I gotta respect a man so hopelessly lost in a romantic trance the seemingly divine comic irony of modern life can seem to fade into the background. Like Ebert pointed out: "-Keaton, dressed in his Sunday best, walks to his girl's house. He is unaware that two small boys are following him, marching in lockstep--and that following them is Annabelle Lee herself. He arrives at her door. She watches unobserved. He polishes his shoes on the backs of his pants legs, and then knocks, pauses, looks about, and sees her standing right behind him. This moment would have inspired an overacted double-take from many other silent comedians. Keaton plays it with his face registering merely heightened interest. They go inside. He sits next to her on the sofa. He becomes aware that the boys have followed them in. His face reflects slight unhappiness. He rises, puts on his hat as if to leave and opens the door, displaying such courtesy you would think the boys were his guests. The boys walk out and he closes the door on them. He is not a man playing for laughs, but a man absorbed in a call on the most important person in his life. That's why it's funny. That's also why the movie's most famous shot works--the one where, rejected by his girl, he sits disconsolately on the drive-rod of the big engine. As it begins to move, it lifts him up and down, but he does not notice, because he thinks only of Annabelle Lee."

As the plot opens it is the outbreak of the Civil War, based William Pittenger the real life engineer to inspire Keaton's Johnny and author of the book the film was adapted from "the Great Locomotive Chase.” Just about every man in Annabelle's immediate life has gotten the inspiration to volunteer to enlist in the army to fight the Union. She urges Johnny to join but when faced with evaluation at the enlistment center -unbeknownst to him the reason why at the time- Johnny is unfairly rejected. When being tossed out on his 'trouble-making' behind on the front entrance Johnny's fellow male companions, members of Annabelle's family encourage him to cut in line ahead of them but a miscommunication between Johnny and them leads the men to report back to Annabelle that Johnny refused to even try out. Now it's Annabelle who's left in the dark as when confronted later Johnny tries to explain his actions to her but the broad apparently Patriotic as shit, turns stone cold on Johnny's ass and lays out for him flat - "I don't want you to speak to me again until you are in uniform!" Damn baby?! -So the war unfolds, Johnny is left to manage the rail system as the higher authorities figure his skills are better put to use working as an engineer. However, in a dastardly covert double-cross, Union spys whom have infiltrated the enemy camp commandeer the main locomotive the General by force and in the process eventually end up kidnapping Annabelle on board!

In one fast paced but flawlessly executed comedic gag and stunt after another - Johnny springs into action, having nearly everything that can go wrong does, and it's only by sheer dumb luck that he ever manages to catch up to the General in the first place by foot, by commandeering a manual-push sidecar, then by bicycle, only to tail and pursue the evasive General in rival locomotive behind named the Texas. -When Keaton's character ultimately catches up with his girl the process it's taken us to get here so far begins to works itself backward when the two parties end up switching trains and Johnny and Annabelle forced to work together at break-neck speed at an every increasing proximous General behind them! --i don't wanna admit I had my doubts considering everyone's love for Buster Keaton these days but having seem so little of his work up to this point although the material is a little too aged to render me breaking out in gut-busting laughter I must admit my smile was both present on the out and inside of my face as the GENIUS of this motion picture filled me with warmth and contained satisfaction. More than a comedy I would almost characterize this movie as a action thriller as I found myself glued to the screen unable to look away as Johnny's creative shenanigans and antics - each one more offbeat and elaborate than the next and seeming to get Johnny and his 'belle' there out of trouble just in the nick of time!

Every moment is played to its utmost potential and renders the audience speechless. You damn near cry how smart Keaton and his fellow makers played everything in this tour-de-force, with so many memorable moments it's hard to know where to start - the cannonball incident, chopping blocks of wood under pressure and dismembering the General's own compartments, the frustrating zigzagging dual tracks, the car on fire, the cigar under the table, the sniper in the bushes, the beartrap gag, the list is endless? As Ebert pointed out which was a major concern for the studios at the time - considering this film a thriller at the time before release would have been considered 'lunacy'. Seeing as this is a chase movie that involves trains which normally can bypass each other and can't stop on a dime or speed up on command, you'd think the film's pacing would be worse for wears? All I can say is you have to see it to believe it - it's THAT uncanny, Keaton manages to pull it all together and elevate the film to an almost unleveled prestige. It certainly SEEMS appropriate enough to consider this an action movie considering Keaton all throughout the film is seen performing like an acrobat and is well known throughout his entire career to perform all his own stunts - including I've been told extremely dangerous ones. When you see the film for yourself you could probably better appreciate 'just how dangerous some of those stunts must have been?' --But it's all a success in the end, beautifully shot, refreshingly authentic on location shoots, with an ingenious story and execution that words just don't do justice. Be sure to see this one for yourselves whenever y'all get a chance, you'd be really doing yourself a disservice otherwise!!!...

ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 161  Average listal rating (71 ratings) 7.8  IMDB Rating 7.8 
2962. The Adventures of Prince Achmed (1926)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 529  Average listal rating (289 ratings) 8.6  IMDB Rating 8.4 
2961. Sunrise (1927)

People who added this item 1655  Average listal rating (831 ratings) 8.3  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2960. Metropolis (1927)
[Review in Working Progress...]
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 176  Average listal rating (89 ratings) 8  IMDB Rating 7.9 
2959. The Unknown (1927)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 168  Average listal rating (68 ratings) 8.1  IMDB Rating 7.4 
2958. Napoléon (1927)

People who added this item 149  Average listal rating (68 ratings) 7.5  IMDB Rating 7.8 
2957. Wings (1927)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 152  Average listal rating (77 ratings) 8.2  IMDB Rating 7.9 
2956. The Crowd (1928)

People who added this item 600  Average listal rating (312 ratings) 8.8  IMDB Rating 8.3 
2955. The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)
ToonHead2102's rating:

People who added this item 105  Average listal rating (48 ratings) 7.6  IMDB Rating 7.7 
2954. The Docks of New York (1928)


-The Kid (1921) [added 12/27/14]
-Rope (1948) [added 12/08/14]
-Victim (1961) [added 01/13/15]
-Duel (1971) [added 01/02/15]
-Rih essed (a.k.a. Man of Ashes) (1986) [added 12/07/14]
-Groundhog Day (1993) [added 02/28/15]
-Interstellar (2014) [added 02/01/15]

[READ BEFORE YOU READ] First off, my gratitude and appreciation toward everyone who continues to read and visit this page. I'm glad it still gets exposure to this day, I put a lot of hard work into it despite the fact I keep re-arranging it and changing it. I'm grateful to everyone's patience with my fickle decision making. -For those that are newbucket list - to top all bucket lists I might add. This is the longest lasting probably cause it's the first list I've managed to upload to Listal and is thus probably my most voted on. Done as a 'counter' to the now infamous "1001 Movies to See Before You Die..." list by Steven Jay Schneider, I originally started doing this out of frustration toward some of the choices I found on that list, so this was originally my own personal 'critique' on that list. But then I got a little side-tracked and ended up getting ambitious after I found another list circulating over the internet by Movie Maniac called "ANOTHER 1001 Movies to See Before You Die..." so I expanded the list to 2002. Wondering if anybody would even care, I decided further I wanted something that nobody else could seem to touch, at least for now? And so I encouraged myself to go to 3003 after discovering yet another list that's been published by TimeOut entitled "1000 Movies That Will Change Your Life..." I gotta admit, I love the sound of that.

Personally in my own life, I've been undergoing somewhat of a spiritual awakening you might say. As elements of my personal life sometimes have to take priority over my usual hobbies which include making lists on this site, I also happen when watching these films in my off time - almost to see embedded messages that seem to be directed toward me in the experience of watching them. I like to include those insights in most of my reviews. So this is a lot more that simply my movie diary, it's more like my personal journal, and the important life lessons I'm learning and going through that seem to coincide with the films that I'm choosing to sit through on the night in question.

The criteria for this list consists of critically acclaimed and cult favorite movies I've heard about, seen, or are just now discovering. I like to read a lot of other lists on this site for reference and most of the time I'm giddy when I'm actually able to find a good to great film that I've seen that most here actually haven't heard of, but there only seems to be a few of those on here. -Much like Schneider's criteria for his list, most of these are films that deserve to be called the GREATEST MOVIES EVER MADE while others are more like classic "B-movies" that just make great cinematic experiences, you just gotta see this film before you die! It seems like everywhere I go on this website I seem to keep coming in to yet more lists that provide me with yet more film titles that I've never heard of so I like to document all of them in my Reference lists for any of you whom have seen those. -So if nothing else what I'd like to suggest any of you who have a bucket list like I do, y'all can consider this your own reference source if you don't wanna read the reviews.

Yes, some of these I haven't seen yet but I'm getting to them and I've heard enough great things to keep them here until I can get around to them. -The sum of this list's entirety is made up of films that may scare you and make you cry as well as laugh, but hopefully not waste your time or insult your intelligence. Although I do include some self indulgent guilty pleasures but most of which because I'm obsessed with the concept are what I like to consider -and hopefully I'm right when you get around to seeing them- films that will change your life! Especially since they're continuing to alter my own life.

So if you like what you see and read don't forget to leave me a comment and vote (not necessarily in that order) and feel free to tell me if you agree or disagree. Or if you wanna turn me on to other movies you may want me to see. Tell me what you want me to review next, want me to watch, what you would like to see get included, petition what you would like to see excluded - even if I may disagree, you can still tell me why you hate the film. --And of course if you don't like what you see or disagree, hey, it's my personal philosophy that nobody becomes a listophile without a subconscious desire to piss people off! You're welcome!*raise middle finger*

I wanna stress I'm not a professional reviewer or critic so don't crucify me if you feel I 'got it wrong' or sound like a fucking idiot. Or if I go a little off topic with such things I like to discuss like occult symbolism and Illuminati references. Or if I tend to go off a little too long on the plot descriptions (I try to provide spoiler alerts whenever I feel I need to place one) This is usually just me trying to figure out the underlining meaning in my head. I try to focus most on what this film means to me so sorry I don't generally go into detail on filmmaking insider stuff like technical specs and production notes, and movie trivia and all that kind of stuff. Just simply what I took away from the experience - which is what I feel watching a movie should be like.

So in closing this is basically my life in film. Films I'm just now experiencing, some I've seen in childhood. Although my memory is a little fuzzy so currently I'm trying to find some of these titles so I can refresh my memories - which as you all can guess often turns out to be a bit of a let down. But overall I hope you enjoy reading -or just looking at- what I consider to be the GREATEST FILMS IN CINEMA HISTORY!!!...

Added to

23 votes
Roman's Exceptional Listal (81 lists)
list by PulpRoman
Published 1 year, 7 months ago 6 comments
23 votes
Favorite Lists (121 lists)
list by Happy Vader
Published 3 years, 1 month ago 6 comments

Related lists

The Golden Age of Hollywood
260 item list by Moon River
7 votes 1 comment
Golden Age of Greek Literature
11 item list by zabdiel
48 votes 5 comments
1996: Best Rap Albums
11 item list by mojack
When I was 33... movie diary, 2015
9 item list by almozayaf666
4 votes
Hollywood's Golden Age
54 item list by Karolina
88 votes 11 comments
1991: Best Rap Albums
14 item list by mojack
2 votes 1 comment
The Golden Age of Monsters Movies
436 item list by indianastar
favorite far
50 item list by chrischan
5 votes
The 10 Essential Anime Series
10 item list by Veed
24 votes
Best War movies I watched so far....
24 item list by Shivajkpm
2 votes 3 comments

View more top voted lists

People who voted for this also voted for

Vatican's 45 Best Films List
Midnight Sun Film Festival's Main Guests
Alain Resnais: Underrated American Films
The 67 Most Influential Films Ever Made 2000s List
Jonathan Rosenbaum 1895 - 1929
Amazing Underrated Obscure Bizarre Films PART 11
They Shoot Pictures Don't They? (2013)
Festival de Cannes - The Jury
Derek Malcolm: Century of Film
The 101 Most Controversial Films of All-Time
Amazing Underrated Obscure Bizarre Films PART 6

More lists from ToonHead2102

Best Cinematography 2014...
Best Foreign Language Film 2014...
Dream Dictionary


Posted: 2 years, 11 months ago at Apr 28 18:03
Extraordinary! :)
Posted: 2 years, 10 months ago at May 31 10:28
This is great... I've read a few so far and something tells me I won't stop unless and until I read ALL!

I may never be able to rank this much but however, care to see mine?:
Posted: 2 years, 8 months ago at Jul 11 7:18
I'm not so sure about this list...

I mean, it is a great concept and there is definitely some potential but it is such a shore to go through a list made of 3000 items... Usually, when I see your list, I check the 1st page and then I just give up. I think it would work better if you split it up.

For example, JayTrotter has made some fabulous lists called
'Amazing Underrated Obscure Bizarre Films'. Instead of making one big list like you, he made 10 of them which is much more user friendly.

check it out :

I really wonder, out of the 15 people who voted, how many did actually check the whole list...

Another thing that annoys me is that it seems that you put some movies which you haven't actually seen. How do you know they are any good? Personally, I haven't seen 46% but since I never past the 1st page, I wouldn't know which movies I still have to watch...
Posted: 2 years, 8 months ago at Jul 11 15:32
From the 15, I think I was the only one who saw the whole thing... I like it and I appreciate the hard-work put into this!

@Johan: I think you forgot to read the description box on the right... I hope it will clear up everything!
Posted: 2 years, 8 months ago at Jul 20 4:09
wow....thank you for reminding me of them...I had seen "The Kid" funny and meaningful too
Posted: 2 years, 4 months ago at Nov 23 13:43
Thank yous go out to everyone that's been stopping in and voting on my list, thanx so much guyz!

Sweet, I've finally made it PASSED the halfway point and am up to 54% watched!!!:)...

(Surefire sign I have WAY TOO MUCH time on my hands?)
Edit: 2 years, 4 months ago
Posted: 1 year, 11 months ago at Apr 9 16:54
Amazing work! Thank you for your work!
Posted: 1 year, 11 months ago at Apr 9 16:58
You've made a big mistake. You said that Billy Wilder dirested It Happened One Night. It was Frank Capra.
Posted: 10 months, 1 week ago at May 23 22:31
its a really long list but cool notheless, i find it kinda sad that you put so much work to it and so many views but yet only a few people were not lazy enough to press the vote button.
Posted: 3 months, 4 weeks ago at Dec 1 19:22
What is this list about?
Posted: 3 months, 3 weeks ago at Dec 8 0:57
Just read the description to the side for an explanation;)...

Login or Signup to post a comment