Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
Added by Lexie on 11 Sep 2010 03:43
18570 Views 6 Comments

Differences from books to movies: Harry Potter

Add header image

Choose file... or enter url:
Sort by: Showing 9 items
Rating: List Type:

Harry is described with green eyes in the books, while he has blue eyes in the movies. Harry's hair is described as very untidy in the books, but in the movies it isn't that notable.

In the book, Harry looks into the Mirror of Erised and sees his whole family. In the film, he only sees his mum and dad.

In the book, when Draco Malfoy paralyzed and covered Harry with his invisibility cloak on the Hogwarts Express, it was Tonks who rescued Harry. In the movie there was Luna Lovegood who found him.

In the movie, Harry never learn that it was his father and his friends who made the Maraurder's Map. In the movie we just learn that Lupin knows how to use it.
Lexie's rating:
Average listal rating (1498 ratings) 7.8 IMDB Rating 0

In the books, Hermione is described having large front teeth, which isn't that notable in the movies.

Hermione founds S.P.E.W. (Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare) in the books, but it did not make it to the movie.
Lexie's rating:
Average listal rating (751 ratings) 6.8 IMDB Rating 0

Ron is described as the tallest of Harry's friends in the book, but he isn't that tall in the movies.

In the book, Ron has freckles, but in the movies he have none.
Lexie's rating:

The books highly invested on the story between Remus and Nymphadora Tonks, while there were little about it in the movies. The only thing that indicate their relationship is when Remus & Tonks leave the Burrow on Christmas Eve, and Tonks calls Remus "sweetheart".

The movie doesn't show anything about the fact that it was Fenrir Greyback that bit Remus.
Average listal rating (1623 ratings) 8.4 IMDB Rating 0

Most of Sirius's backstory was cut from the movie.
Lexie's rating:
Average listal rating (1384 ratings) 8.1 IMDB Rating 0

More focus is put on the fact that Snape is the Half-blood Prince in the book than in the movie.
Lexie's rating:

The story about Voldemort's ancestor Gaunt and his family were not shown in the movie.
Lexie's rating:

Bellatrix is described in the books as having long, straigth black hair, while in the movie she has more bushy hair.

The attack of Bellatrix and Fenrir Greyback on the Burrow was not in the book.
Lexie's rating:

In the book, Neville is described as short, plump and blonde. Meanwhile, in the movie he is quite the opposite: tall, somewhat slim and dark haired.

The story of Neville's parents is not in the movie.
Lexie's rating:

Added to

Related lists

Official Harry Potter books
10 item list by Elfflame
6 votes
Best Harry Potter films
8 item list by judmac1
29 votes 6 comments
Hot guys from Harry Potter!
17 item list by Lee
31 votes 7 comments
Harry Potter
7 item list by memo
2 votes
Name Meanings from Harry Potter Series
42 item list by The_Dash08
125 votes 11 comments
World of Harry Potter
74 item list by jay-jay
60 votes 11 comments
Harry Potter Movies Rated from 1 - 8
8 item list by Caster Movies (OCs)
1 votes
Harry Potter Affiliated
113 item list by Elfflame
43 votes 11 comments
Books - Favorite Books
16 item list by mazardeus
2 votes

View more top voted lists

People who voted for this also voted for

More lists from Lexie


Posted: 7 years, 7 months ago at Nov 21 0:03
alot of the things they left out bugs me, but the attack they added totally makes me mad.
great list!
Posted: 7 years, 6 months ago at Dec 27 23:42
There are so many things they cut. :/ It's actually disappointing as the movies as a whole could've been so much better if they had just followed what Rowling had set into *her* book.
Posted: 6 years, 4 months ago at Jan 30 18:52
They should have given Gary Oldman more time on the screen as Sirius Black!
Posted: 6 years, 4 months ago at Jan 31 1:38
Well, is not easy to transfer 500 pages of a book in a 2 hour film...
Posted: 6 years, 4 months ago at Jan 31 1:38
I was sad Dobby wasn't as much in the films as he was in the books but anyways, and a really really liked the change in Snape's dead, that was really really good!
Posted: 6 years, 2 months ago at Apr 7 21:54
Hate to be known as the critical one but I have to say a couple of things: 1) Dan was going to wear green contacts but he was allergic so he couldn't for medical reasons 2)Because they were already cutting Tonks part, they were playing Luna's character up 3) Rupert with stilts or high boots or whatever else just wouldn't have worked so we got him the way he is-and lets be honest, would we have wanted another Ron? 4) Emma did a part with big front teeth to try it but it just didn't work out 5)I was so disappointed that they didn't have time for Remus and Tonks but they had to do what they had to do :( 6) Many viewers would not have wanted to have to listen about histories of people- I mean how do you incorporate that?- NOT to say that I would have minded I loved learning about Tom Riddle and Severus Snape 7) To be honest, I do commemnd you for remembering Bellatrix appearance but at the same time I think Helena Bonham Carter did an excellent, excellent job and I could not have asked for better 8)Neville was slightly plump in the younger movies

Post comment

Insert image

drop image here
(or click)
or enter URL:
 link image?  square?

Insert video

Format block