Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Added by diabolical dr voodoo on 30 Aug 2009 05:02
1482 Views 2 Comments

Changes... For Better or Worse?

Add header image

Choose file... or enter url:
Sort by: Showing 11 items
Decade: Rating: List Type:
People who added this item 6561 Average listal rating (4466 ratings) 7.5 IMDB Rating 8.3
Batman Begins (2005)
starring: Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel.

answer: Better.

reason: Katie Holmes might have a cute face, but Maggie is much more of an actress, she should've been there since the beginning. But then again, who knows, if she were in Batman Begins, she might be married to Tom Cruise today. Not a good idea.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
directed by: Steven Spielberg or Guillermo del Toro or Tim Burton.

answer: MUCH better.

reason: I really like David Fincher, but in this film I found out that he's not the ideal director to tell a fantasy story.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 2020 Average listal rating (1312 ratings) 5.6 IMDB Rating 6.1
without any participation of Madonna whatsoever.

answer: a bit better.

reason: The plot would still suck, but without Madonna, at least we wouldn't hear the worst theme of the series in the worst film of the series, it's too much for one film alone!
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 2501 Average listal rating (1516 ratings) 7.3 IMDB Rating 7.6
starring: Winona Ryder as Mary Corleone.

answer: Don't Know.

reason: People pick on Sofia Coppola, saying she was by far the worst thing on The Godfather Part III. I don't think so. At the time she was unexperienced as an actress (and probably still is), but I think that lack of experience brought a vulnerability to the character, that any 18 year-old has. Mary was supposed to take over her father's business but deep down she had no idea of what to do with such a huge power, she was completely overwhelmed with it. Her casting wasn't mere nepotism.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 2433 Average listal rating (1561 ratings) 7.1 IMDB Rating 7.5
directed by: David Lynch.

answer: Better.

reason: Wes Craven did a good job here, but just imagine what the best director to deal with nightmares could do.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 535 Average listal rating (361 ratings) 6.5 IMDB Rating 6.8
starring: Connery or Roger Moore.

answer: Better.

reason: Lazenby did a great job and delivered one of the best lines of the series, but Connery saying goodbye to the franchise with the death of Bond's wife would be awesome. And the film has the right ammount of comedy that would give Moore a good job. And it would also help in the continuity of the series in any case.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
starring: Tom Selleck as Indy.

answer: Worse.

reason: Tom Selleck was actually considered for the role, but no one could do it better than Harrison Ford, no doubt about it.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 2606 Average listal rating (1663 ratings) 4.9 IMDB Rating 5.2
Scary Movie 2 (2001)
starring: Marlon Brando as the Exorcist Priest.

answer: Better.

reason: Brando was envited to play the role that eventually went to James Woods. Nothing against James Woods, but Brando is simply the best actor of them all.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
directed by: David Fincher.

answer: Better.

reason: Lucas did here the best film of the new trilogy, but Fincher would make it much darker, just the way to then, reach the quality of the old trilogy (but I might have to reconsider it, after being disappointed with The Curious Case of Benjamin Button).
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
starring: Christopher Walken as Han Solo.

answer: don't know.

reason: Christopher Walken is a great actor. And although I like Harrison Ford as Han Solo, I can't deny that it would be interesting to see Chirstopher Walken on the role too.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:
People who added this item 1066 Average listal rating (704 ratings) 6.4 IMDB Rating 6.8
Superman II (1980)
directed by: Richard Donner.

answer: Better.

reason: Donner did a great job with the original film, he would make this sequel just as good.
diabolical dr voodoo's rating:

What do you think?

Added to

Related lists

Couples that ignore numbers...
63 item list by BRODO
108 votes 22 comments
45 item list by TrekMedic
25 votes 4 comments
Sex & Sexuality - Cult Flicks & Trash Pics
88 item list by AFIoscar
6 votes
16 item list by badwolf
24 votes 2 comments
For better or worse, Hollywood marriages...
20 item list by Lolly4Holly
10 votes
Colour Change Better or Worse?
30 item list by irishblue
2 votes 2 comments
Compare Colour Change Better or Worse? 2
16 item list by irishblue
1 votes
Weddings & Wedding Dresses in TV Shows
113 item list by EmmaBell
18 votes
All the D.Gray-Man Covers
23 item list by Kamichan
2 votes

View more top voted lists

People who voted for this also voted for

More lists from diabolical dr voodoo


Posted: 6 years, 1 month ago at Aug 31 19:19
I am amazed that you think "Button" wasn't well made. Fincher is one of the best directors working today. I agree it might have been slightly better with Steven Spielberg at the helm, but you might have to worry about some alien twist ending.
Edit: 6 years, 1 month ago
Posted: 7 months ago at Mar 4 19:46
I couldn't agree more about Madonna! The commentary on other films was also interesting.

Login or Signup to post a comment

Insert image

drop image here
(or click)
or enter URL:
 link image?  square?

Insert video

Format block