(Above left:Photographers clearly think the public is very stupid.)
Without photoshop, chicken cutlets and incessantly endless self hype simultaneously aimed at little children and grown men, Katy Perry would not be famous. It is all she has ever talked of, bragged about or defended. And she's not even remotely as big as her insipid hype. Below: The 2012 Interview Magazine cover where she's been digitally reconstructed to look like an old school Italian starlet is one very sour and pitiful joke to those of us who love the REAL thing.
(Left below) One the most fake looking "candids" ever. The resizing and blurring is clearly obvious from her right arm-pit to her left hand as well as the fact the entire picture was digitally altered to where it almost looks like it's melted. Very obvious if you enlarge the photo (no pun intended)
(Right)Katy Perry as is.
Left: Obvious resize on the outer part of the vest as well as the entire photo. Right: Katy looking real
A Bcup to a digital GG cup via extreme photoshop for the airhead from Brazil. You'd think Irving Penn would have more talent than a 12 year old.
Gisele must think people are blind as she claims her measurements are "35C-23-35.5" which is pathetically false. No wonder there are so many eating disorders. These models, designers and magazines are lying money pits that hate women of all shapes and sizes.
"Fraud your way to a billion"
Madonna is the forerunner of altering photos to the point where it could be another person as well as blatantly obvious chest retouching via "magic marker cleavage" and "solo inflata' boob". This repeat offender who's most recent fraud for The Girl Gone Wild single cover must be THEE worst photo shop and digital boob job of all time started the tired Post MTV media tradition of lying with the camera. Truly, if you think the above right is even remotely real you are being duped by the media.
2000s: Flop gone wild with photoshop for Arena Magazine where the computer only blew up one side.
Worst Steven Meisel cleavage madonna photoshop fakes EVER above and below-how does one choose? The man is an incompetent joke. Photos of the very linear Madonna pathetically trying to copy the hourglass goddess Marilyn Monroe and the "buxotic" Pop Art claiic herself, Jayne Mansfield. No. Not "tributes". Tributes are a one or two time occurrence not something you base an entire career out of-that's called a "rip off" or a "copy".
(Hint-Retouching a long thick black shadow on a body builder's chest and "smudging the shadows" is not "cleavage" and Jayne Mansfield was not cut with bicep bulge and lats)
Jayne Mansfield, the REAL thing, compared to an unphotoshopped Madonna
Madonna was always small of stature, bust, hips and originality despite her PR. Despite basing her entire look (on and off camera) for nearly decade on Marilyn Monroe (their names were almost interchangeable in the 80s even more so than the way Lady Gaga and Madonna's are today) she could not be farther away from being built like the classic Hollywood sex goddesses.
Above right: awful upper chest retouch fail. Below: Black photoshopped crescent around armpits and underboob looks so false and silly.
Above: The unphotoshopped Madonna is an athletic slightly built, linear shaped woman not a "modern 1950's Pin up".